Overview Statistic: PDF-Downloads (blue) and Frontdoor-Views (gray)

On the Difference Between Real and Complex Arrangements.

Please always quote using this URN: urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-648
  • If $B$ is an arrangement of linear complex Hyperplanes in $C^d$, then the following can be constructed from knowledge of its intersection lattice: (a) the cohomology groups of the complement [Br], (b) the cohomology algebra of the complement [OS], (c) the fundamental group of the complement, if $d\le2$, (d) the singularity link up to homeomorphism, if $d\le3$, (e) the singularity link up to homotopy type [ZZ]. If $B'$ is, more generally, a 2-arrangement in $ R^{2d}$ (an arrangement of real subspaces of codimension 2 with even-dimensional intersections), then the intersection lattice still determines (a) the cohomology groups of the complement [GM] and (e) the homotopy type of the singularity link [ZZ]. We show, however, that for 2-arrangements the data (b), (c) and (d) are not determined by the intersection lattice. They require the knowledge of extra information on sign patterns, which can be computed as determinants of linear relations, or (equivalently) as linking coefficients in the sense of knot theory.

Download full text files

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar Statistics - number of accesses to the document
Metadaten
Author:Günter M. Ziegler
Document Type:ZIB-Report
Date of first Publication:1991/12/06
Series (Serial Number):ZIB-Report (SC-91-14)
ZIB-Reportnumber:SC-91-14
Published in:Appeared in: Mathematische Zeitschrift 212 (1993) pp. 1-11
Accept ✔
Diese Webseite verwendet technisch erforderliche Session-Cookies. Durch die weitere Nutzung der Webseite stimmen Sie diesem zu. Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier.